Category: Television

Sandman: The TV series, from the creator of Supernatural? First things first..

Posted by – September 2, 2010

Looks like it may happen. But a couple of points:

  • Regardless of whoever gets put in charge that is not Neil Gaiman – should really talk to Neil Gaiman.
  • If Neil Gaiman isn’t involved, Lord have mercy on your soul that you don’t bugger it up If you do bugger it up, the show will sink faster than a rubber duck with a hole in it’s bottom. And it will make it much, much harder for you to make any non-endorsed Neil Gaiman story into TV or film property. Thankfully I believe Mr. Gaiman pretty much now controls all his own rights to everything he has written since.
  • If the show fails and Neil Gaiman has been involved? There is no fail. There is only success. The word fail will cease to exist while the show runs.
  • I’ve always associated Supernatural with women’s television programming as the show has primarily aired on Living TV which at the time was aimed pretty squarely at women. It’s attempted to broaden it’s horizons by buying in shows like CSI, etc., but I’m still not entirely convinced. If Sandman is to be produced in the US by WB TV, it’s going to need support from a good syndication network that does not involve silly demographically-lead TV channels. It needs a home where you’re not associated primarily by any one particular demographic. Yes, even for a fantasy product. And if you can sell a series such as the Moffat/Gattis Sherlock to people who generally hate the detective genre, then you’re doing your job properly.
  • I’ll only be convinced of the show if Gaiman is involved with it. And I’ve seen the pilot (whether or not he is involved).

    UK Indie Production Companies angry with BBC plans for iPlayer

    Posted by – August 28, 2010

    I’ve just read the following article at PaidContent (thanks to Jon Jacob’s tweet) and am astonished at the short sightedness of indie production companies in this country. But this would require some significant changes in how the iPlayer is currently offered. If the BBC opens up the iPlayer to TV license payers overseas, then it’ll have to come up with a mechanism for proving the viewer is indeed a valid TV license payer.

    The BBC might consider deploying a system in which you register your TV license number with iPlayer and this information is stored within your BBC iD account. This would prevent those (such as myself) without a TV license from accessing BBC content. This could potentially then allow the BBC to obtain more revenue by offering people such as myself an iPlayer-only pass. This could be offered on a tiered level – one iPlayer-only license for non-live (archived) content, the other tier would allow users to access live broadcasts via iPlayer and archived content. The iPlayer only license would not cover any TV equipment with tuners, however.

    Having an additional option to the TV license would generate more revenue for the Beeb, and hopefully make the independent production companies happier as money money to the Beeb will (hopefully) mean more money to them through new commissions.

    The problem is that how many devices and locations would you allow each TV/iPlayer license to access the service simultaneously? Would iPlayer see where you’ve been accessing the content and then prevent access if it sees somebody from London watching Stephen Fry Tap Dances on the Moon while somebody in Barcelona watches Mongrels using the same TV/iPlayer license number at the same time?

    The M-Factor: Motion Capture Talent Show!

    Posted by – August 24, 2010

    My other big TV pitch would be for a brand new talent show in which contestants wear motion/performance capture suits and do their piece away from the judges. Then, using visual effects and post-production techniques, contestants’ performances are giving a polish. Imagine the possibilities with magic acts – you’d outdo David Copperfield and Lance Burton something chronic. It’s not camera trickery/cheating – it’s an enhanced performance! The judges then base their opinions on the finished article, with the best contestant(s) and associated production team sent to boot camp. Winner gets to star in Avatar 2 as a talking plant.

    Crap dancers can be made to dance like devils, dancing and singing dogs can really dance and sing (with the voice of Frank Sinatra), singers can look and sound like their idols, jugglers can juggle elephants, and so on. The possibilities are endless.

    Yes, the M-Factor would be a TV ratings smash hit. Come on – this is Simon Cowell’s dream. Extremely polished “normal” people. I’d call the show, Britain’s Got the M-Factor. Sponsored by Jar-Jar Binks. And the beauty is that you could get two shows out of one. Given the tight fitting nature of the performance capture suits, you could also film Hole in the Wall at exactly the same time!

    An exclusive interview with the X-Factor’s sound engineer!

    Posted by – August 23, 2010

    After the controversy of whether the X-Factor is selectively using auto-tune/vocoder, I managed to track down Horatio P. Bogbrush, a sound engineer on the X-Factor to discuss the issue. He very little to say on the subject other than, “well – we have to do a lot of work on the judge’s voices. Simon Cowell, for instance is in reality, a fair few octaves above that of a mouse and thus we have to bring the pitch and speed down quite considerably. As for Louis Walsh, he’s more of the Barry White persuasion and in most cases his voices causes windows to vibrate and cups to smash. So we up his voice pitch quite considerably as a consequence – otherwise people’s ears would implode.”

    Horatio has previous worked with many famous clients, including Jamie Callum. Here’s one of Horatio’s proudest moments in sound engineering for live TV:

    Of course, Jamie has gone on to become an international superstar and it’s because of Horatio’s handiwork that we can be grateful for this, and it looks as if the future of the X-Factor winner sets to be in safe hands.

    X-Factor using auto-tune system for select contestants?

    Posted by – August 22, 2010

    Update: X-Factor production admit to tweaking voices due to “the number of microphones used during recording”. Which seems utter bull to me, as we’ve never heard this sort of nonsense in previous series. Personally, I prefer my “interview” with the X-Factor sound engineer over the real one.

    Watched X-Factor last night and found it very odd that ITV/Syco or whoever is in charge these days appear to be using an autotune/vocoder sound system to improve the voice of select contestants. A select number because we didn’t hear the system kick in for the G in G&S, and the Michael Jackson tribute bloke (who sounded like a wounded mouse).

    So just why is ITV/Syco using such a system?

    Well, if they’re going to be using autotune/vocoder/digital jiggery pokery – I’m going to enter my laptop for auditions next year. I’ll simply have a table set-up on stage, walk in carrying the laptop, set it on the table, press a button, sit on a chair next to the table and read a newspaper as the laptop starts singing in a Stephen Hawking monotone robot voice about the virtues of believing in life after love by that well known philosopher, Cher.

    My laptop would have various advantages over human contestants. The first is that is has no emotion. No begging the X-Factor judges that it’s always wanted a pop career. No crying when told by Simon Cowell that it’s crap. The second advantage is that there is no accompanying sob story about how it’s RAM is a bit dodgy and it’s hard drives have been knocked about a lot by it’s owner. No sir, this is one loved laptop. And the laptop can probably dance better than most human contestants too. And is more photogenic. AND it can take direction.

    Better still, let’s get enter of those fantastic Toyota/Hyundai humanoid robots AND a laptop as a group. A sure fire win.

    Look out for X-Factor: Rise of the Machines next year.

    BT’s Jane is pregnant alright..

    Posted by – August 18, 2010

    .. with a space monster. How much would it cost me to persuade BT and the ad agency behind this campaign to shoot a chestburster scene? Really. Because I’d like to raise that money and get it made just to spite those that voted for the pregnancy in the first place, and for the rest of us that just want this campaign to end with something funny and with a bit more imagination.

    Perhaps I could ask the UK Film Council.. oh.