Category: Windows

Here comes the madness: Windows 2008 Server certification!

Posted by – March 11, 2010

Memset is the only company I have ever worked for that actively encourages it’s staff to learn and try new things, and will pay for training and certification in technologies that interest individual members of staff.  It works out well for my employers because they’ll get back an employee whose has been properly certified in a particular discipline.  That’s not to say that we’re not already experienced in using these disciplines, but it’s nice to get recognized by the vendors that make it all possible.

I’ve been thinking long and hard about what I’ve wanted to do now I’ve been given the chance.  Back at MPC, which promised the Earth but delivered only dirt, I had wanted to take a course on learning Maya – to help me provide better application support to the artists on the floor, and possibly take my career further in another direction other than just systems administration.  That never happened.  The best I got was a subscription to Safari Books Online.

But prior to MPC all my previous employers operated a bugger-all training policy[*] and I had to learn what I wanted to learn in my own time.  Pretty much my entire career to date was formed from self-learning.  I bought my own books (or borrowed from libraries), bought my own software and hardware, and just had to teach myself how to do things.

Windows seems to be the way forward despite the massive proliferation of Linux.  I’ve been using Linux since around 1994 when the kernel was seriously pre -1.0 and was very experimental.  Windows Server came into my field of version back in 1998 and I’ve been using it on and off since then.  That’s the problem – it’s been on and off.  When I suggested to one of my former employers that we use an email ecosystem that was not Exchange, they bulked at the idea – management wanted Exchange and management was going to get Exchange.  The IT department hadn’t much experience with it, so they paid a consultancy firm to come in and do all the work setting up Domain controllers, Exchange, and all the bits and bobs that go with it.  I dread to think how much was paid to these consultants to do the work.  All I know is that the mail server I managed under Linux and running Exim had survived a major version upgrade and move to new server without any hassles.  Exchange and Windows Server was a lot more problematic and we didn’t have the in-house experience to manage it ourselves.

All throughout my career, Windows experience has been in great demand by potential employers.  Good Windows system admins can earn considerably more than Linux sysadmins in some cases and there appears to be no let down in the demand for Windows servers and VPSes.  So it seemed logical for me to pick a Windows 2008 Server certification that should take me up to MCITP (Microsoft Certified IT Professional) at a minimum.  And that’s what I’m hoping to do over the next few months.

I had considered an official Linux certification such as LPI or RHCE, but it’s a popular choice here and almost everybody else is doing a certification in LPI.  Perhaps that’s something I’ll do after my MCITP, but for the moment I think the benefits that MCITP would bring to my employers and to my overall career development is the way to go right now.

[*] Thankfully not literally.

Cloudy with a chance of falling files..

Posted by – December 16, 2009

I’ve recently been testing a variety of products for storage in Amazon’s S3 service.  I first came to get to know S3 through Rackspace’s Jungle Disk service which provides a Windows, Mac or Linux client that can backup all your files to the “cloud” either using S3 or Rackspace’s own “cloud” offering.

While I am very impressed with Jungle Disk’s Windows server backup solution, I’m not so convinced on the Windows or Mac desktop service.  Timeouts at both Amazon and Rackspace’s Jungle Disk gateway as well as numerous other little problems has not convinced me I want to entrust to it my 17Gb of well earned music, film and TV collection on iTunes.  I’m fine with the Windows backup since (a) Memset backs up the MDaemon directory nightly anyway, and (b) I’ve not seen any errors.

But something with Amazon S3 (particularly their Europe service) made me think that if I could find a utility that allows me to upload and download stuff as easily as an FTP client, or even offer full sync capabilities, I would still have a use for it.  Sadly, the options are very limited and I have to say I’m not at all impressed.

On the Mac, there is Cyberduck.  This is an FTP, SFTP, SCP,S3, WebDAV, Rackspace Cloud, MobileMe file transfer client.  It’s literally the Swiss army knife of file transfer clients and the very best thing I’ve seen for any platform.  Ever.  I can create S3 buckets easily in Amazon’s EU datacentres and upload/download and even mirror entire directories.  If I interrupt the transfer, I can resume the next time without any fuss.  Very confident my data is safe with Cyberduck.  And Cyberduck is freeware/donation-ware in that it’s free to use, but a donation to the author is appreciated.

I then tried Time Warp for OS X.  This is currently in beta and is free to use while this is so.  Unfortunately Time Warp did not offer me the choice of Amazon datacentre and seems to default to the US.  No good.

Next up was Atomic Drive.  This is a cross-platform client, but like Jungle Disk, requires that you sign-up to them and pay them a small monthly fee for the privilege of using the client (fair enough) as well as the S3 transfer/storage fees.  Unfortunately the client only allows US datacentre use, and does not resume transfers if you’re in the middle of transferring gigabytes of data and need to interrupt for whatever reason you may have.  This is not good.

After that was S3 Bucket Explorer, but found the user interface unwelcoming and cluttered (and the queue system I found to be too fussy).  It also takes an age to load on the Mac.

Thus the winner on the Mac is: Cyberduck.  By far the friendliest and most feature packed S3 client I ever come across.

In terms of Windows clients, I was even more disappointed with the choice available.  Cloudberry Lab appears to the be leading developer of S3 clients.  They have a dedicated backup product (CloudBerry Backup) as well as a general S3 bucket explorer-cum-FTP client called CloudBerry S3 Explorer PRO.  I liked CloudBerry Backup very much, apart from one problem.  The bandwidth and usability was sufficiently uncontrollable that my wife and I argued over it’s use!  I was forced, to keep the peace, to uninstall the product, even after limiting the bandwidth used by CBB, since stopping the manual backup saw the backup resume again after a minute.  Pausing the backup still seemed to  do the job, but activity was still present.  Thus, with regret, I had to walk away from this product which when I saw it working, seems to be one of the best I’ve seen.

Cloudberry S3 Explorer PRO is another product which I like, but seems to suffer from a problem whereby if I’m uploading a lot of files and then close the program, restart it, and kick off the queue again, just get errors upon errors and cannot resume the transfer for the files still in the queue.  I’ll need to look at the debug/log files to figure why that is.  Haven’t had the time to do so as yet.  The user interface is clean, crisp – everything I like in an FTP client and is very straight forward.  If I can get around the queue issue, I think this would be the best product for S3 bucket management for Windows.

I have yet to look at Cross FTP for Windows (or Mac), or CloudBuddy (Windows).  Everything else out there seems to be in perpetual development (alpha or beta).

It’s a Chrome away from Chrome.. I’ve switched from Firefox on two platforms!

Posted by – December 15, 2009

While I have given up Google Apps (no, it’s not because I fear the Google and it’s tight grip on my data – I’ll write a blog post about why I left Google Apps a bit later), Google still gets used an awful lot here at Drake Towers.  Google the Search Engine is the de facto here.  Then there’s Google Maps, Google Reader, Feedburner, Google Webmaster Tools,  Google Analytics, Google AdSense, YouTube, and so on.

I now use Google Public DNS on the Dell laptop at home and as a secondary DNS server for my MDaemon mail server.  And now I’ve converted to Google Chrome, Google’s efforts to produce a fast web browser designed for simplicity.  And it works exceptionally well on Windows.  And now OS X.  Despite Chrome being beta on my work Mac, I now use it as my primary browser despite a few kinks (the main one being the passwords are not saved if you’re browsing a site that uses an expired or self-signed certificate – I’ve filed the bug with the Chromium bug report system).

My dependence on Google will not end there either.  While I have no intention of running the Chrome OS on this PC (although if I had a netbook I would probably consider it), I am still very tempted by the T-Mobile G2 Touch which runs the Android 1.5 (at the time of writing) platform.  I’ll be carrying Google in my pocket too.

Office 2010 now in public beta, but some things never change..

Posted by – November 19, 2009

Microsoft have now released Office 2010 as a public beta.  So I decided to download it and give it a go.  The user interface has generally improved in Word, but Outlook 2010 is the one application I had great hopes for and, to be quite frank, am the most disapointed in.

The major issue I have had with Outlook since the last millennium has been that it always top posts.  That is to say, it produces an effect similar to this:

Dear Mr. Drake,

You are quite right, we will give you £25,000,000 to fund the Top Quoting Is Brilliant! Institute.

Yours lovingly,

Microsoft

– Original Message –

From: Mr. Top Posting Genius <topposting@microsoft.com>
To: Outlook Team at Microsoft <flurglemumblings@microsoft.com>
Subject: We’ve got to give this guy money!

See below!

– Forwarded Message –

From: Martyn Drake <contactme@drake.org.uk>
To: Microsoft <welovetoppostingandwillnotchangeitwhateveryousay@microsoft.com>
Subject: Money needed for important project!
Date: 19th November, 2009

Dear Microsoft,

Please can I have some money to fund an institute dedicated to annoying people by only ever allowing top posting in emails.  Bottom posting/trimming replies is a complete waste of time.  I mean, everybody has oodles of bandwidth and nobody has any time to sit and trim their email replies.  So it’s top posting all the way!

Kind regards,

Martyn Drake

Almost every other email client, including the more popular web mail systems (ESPECIALLY Gmail), allows for free choice.  Some even allow you to rewrap the quoted text so that it doesn’t turn out like a bunch of horrible mess when you come to reply to the reply.  The best you can do with Microsoft Outlook, even in 2010, is this:

From: Martyn Drake <contactme@drake.org.uk>
Date: 19th November, 2009

> Dear Microsoft,
> Wibble Wibble Wibble

Message body goes here.

Whereas what I WANT is this:

On 19th November, 2009,  Martyn Drake wrote:

> Wibble Wibble Wibble

Message body goes here.

Without using third party macros for Outlook 2007, and without disabling a whole bunch of stuff, and using signatures to hold templates for certain variables, can you do the type of quoting above.  It’s a hack job.

Microsoft could fix this, but despite feedback, they STILL choose not to do so.  WHEN, Microsoft, will Outlook get proper quality quoting?  I’ll bet we’ll never see it implemented.

Windows 14

Posted by – October 22, 2009

Have received our two copies of Windows 7 through Amazon today (via City Link rather than RM) having pre-ordered since the 15th July.  Will be installing my copy tonight, whereas we'll get around to Jennifer's laptop over the weekend.  Our house will eventually be rid of Vista, the operating system from heck.

I've been running Windows 7 since the Release Candidate, and just over a month with the RTM Windows 7 Enterprise trial, and I can honestly say that I've had no problems whatsoever.  Windows 7 has taken everything I've thrown at it and it's just worked.  It's much nippier and generally much more pleasant to use than both XP and Vista combined.

Let's hope Microsoft continue to uphold this quality of operating system.  I'd hate to see Windows 8 turn into Windows ME and Vista combined.

Why can’t Microsoft keep current pre-order Windows 7 pricing for the duration of the OS’s life?

Posted by – July 17, 2009

As soon as Windows 7 came available for pre-order on the 15th July, Jennifer and I secured our copies.  We have now pre-ordered two FULL copies of Windows 7 Home Premium (E) for £65 through Amazon.co.uk – £32.50 per copy.  Okay, we used a free gift voucher from Be to claim more money off, but nonetheless it's still a bargain.

The demand for Windows 7 has been such that the pre-order price has now gone up to £80 for the Home Premium edition.  When Windows 7 is finally released, it'll go up again.  But why?  Why have Microsoft's operating systems always been so damn expensive (especially the Ultimate editions of Vista and 7)?  In comparison, Apple's OS X have been cheaper, have no activation restriction (with the one exception being OS X Server).  You're forking out a fortune even before you've added any useful applications other than the media players, gimmicky games, and web browser (and even then, Microsoft have taken that out of the European edition of Windows leaving the user to use another computer or magazine cover disc to install one – they didn't have to do this, but Microsoft seem to be sticking fingers up at the EC commission at the expense of their customers).

If I had my way, Windows 7 would be completely free for existing users of Vista who have had to endure a very long time for an operating system which now promises to live up to being a good one.