<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Martyn Drake&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drake.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drake.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ultimate Battle of the Online Backups! by Phunky</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/03/09/the-ultimate-battle-of-the-online-backups-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Phunky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=574#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Will be very interested to see your findings, be good to see alternative ways to connect to each service WebDAV, FTP etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be very interested to see your findings, be good to see alternative ways to connect to each service WebDAV, FTP etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lovely Bones left a Bad Taste; was possibly Brain Dead by Susan Hated Literature &#124; The lovely bones</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/03/05/the-lovely-bones-left-a-bad-taste-was-possibly-brain-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Hated Literature &#124; The lovely bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=558#comment-201</guid>
		<description>[...] reviews: Martyn Drake *spoiler warning there* ; Mosher&#8217;sUnimaginativelyEntitledBlog ; Little white lies     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reviews: Martyn Drake *spoiler warning there* ; Mosher&#8217;sUnimaginativelyEntitledBlog ; Little white lies     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Universal Pictures: bullying the market yet again.. by MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/02/12/universal-pictures-bullying-the-market-yet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=516#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Welcome! Vivendi-Universal have been bad news for years.  I haven&#039;t quite boycotted them, but it does discourage me from going near something if it has their mark on it.  It&#039;s disappointing that we don&#039;t seem to have the same creativity in liberally-licensed film and video that we do in music, audio and text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome! Vivendi-Universal have been bad news for years.  I haven&#8217;t quite boycotted them, but it does discourage me from going near something if it has their mark on it.  It&#8217;s disappointing that we don&#8217;t seem to have the same creativity in liberally-licensed film and video that we do in music, audio and text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VFX and the Film Industry: Credit where benefit&#8217;s due &#8211; for artists &amp; engineers by mee graham</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/02/10/vfx-and-the-film-industry-benefit-where-credits-due-for-artists-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>mee graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=505#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I don&#039;t know whether to be happy or disappointed - because that&#039;s the situation here in India. Only worse. Here, its common for a stunt director or an art director to claim something done in VFX as his own!!!

The effort taken by Lee is commendable and should be encouraged. The VFX industry as a whole needs to unite quite desparately. They are indeed denied respect that they, very very, deserve.  Look, the same guys who like to boast that &quot;everything was real, no VFX was used&quot; would be shamelessly, and desparately hoping the VFX guys would fix or create things they couldn&#039;t get for &quot;real&quot;. Yet, no one likes to acknowledge or credit the guys who worked on them.

I totally disagree with Paddy (no offense mate) that the VFX guys are not working for the specific project but for a facility instead. Thats unacceptable. The so-called &quot;crew&quot; work on many shows too, and are not tied to a specific production. Perhaps the fact they get their cheques from the production house gives the impression that only they work for the show. But, that&#039;s not fair at all. The point is we need to recognize the guys who &quot;worked&quot; for the show - no matter how, and through who.

VFX guys ... speak up or you&#039;d be shut out !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I don&#8217;t know whether to be happy or disappointed &#8211; because that&#8217;s the situation here in India. Only worse. Here, its common for a stunt director or an art director to claim something done in VFX as his own!!!</p>
<p>The effort taken by Lee is commendable and should be encouraged. The VFX industry as a whole needs to unite quite desparately. They are indeed denied respect that they, very very, deserve.  Look, the same guys who like to boast that &#8220;everything was real, no VFX was used&#8221; would be shamelessly, and desparately hoping the VFX guys would fix or create things they couldn&#8217;t get for &#8220;real&#8221;. Yet, no one likes to acknowledge or credit the guys who worked on them.</p>
<p>I totally disagree with Paddy (no offense mate) that the VFX guys are not working for the specific project but for a facility instead. Thats unacceptable. The so-called &#8220;crew&#8221; work on many shows too, and are not tied to a specific production. Perhaps the fact they get their cheques from the production house gives the impression that only they work for the show. But, that&#8217;s not fair at all. The point is we need to recognize the guys who &#8220;worked&#8221; for the show &#8211; no matter how, and through who.</p>
<p>VFX guys &#8230; speak up or you&#8217;d be shut out !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VFX and the Film Industry: Credit where benefit&#8217;s due &#8211; for artists &amp; engineers by Martyn Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/02/10/vfx-and-the-film-industry-benefit-where-credits-due-for-artists-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=505#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Very good points, Paddy.

I do recall at MPC that HR department occasionally got credits for Technical Support.  Which was rather odd and one must ask how that came to be.  But surely there are full time creatives/production staff at most facilities who may work across multiple shows (which may be the executive producer, head of department, etc.) yet they are credited and the engineers, accounts, are not.  To be fair to MPC, in the past they have taken out full spreads in Cinefex and listed the entire staff on particular shows (Harry Potter springs to mind).  

I also fully realise that I work for the facility and not entirely on one show - although where each of us engineers were positioned made it easier to provide support for the show that was currently located in the same area.  We also occasionally got to go to the studios themselves to set-up kit, set-up specific configurations for the show and provide specific support for the show.  And all this juggling the other shows too.  In fact, it was mentioned on numerous occasions in meeting that each show would have one engineer assigned to it as a specific support point for artists, producers, etc.

The credits system, to me, appears to be inconsistent regardless of however an individual facility works.  The reason I gave up working for MPC was there was no career progression.  Those of us that wanted to go into the more creative side ended up doing the crap jobs and moving between departments was a painful experience.  I also lost confidence in senior staff after speaking to them in confidence only to discover they&#039;ve talked to other people that I specifically asked them not to. 

I was poised to move to Framestore at one point, but they clearly never bothered to listen to why I wanted to move away from MPC and what I wanted and as such the negotiations broke down (and my opinion of them rapidly dropped - they don&#039;t care about people, it&#039;s all about numbers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points, Paddy.</p>
<p>I do recall at MPC that HR department occasionally got credits for Technical Support.  Which was rather odd and one must ask how that came to be.  But surely there are full time creatives/production staff at most facilities who may work across multiple shows (which may be the executive producer, head of department, etc.) yet they are credited and the engineers, accounts, are not.  To be fair to MPC, in the past they have taken out full spreads in Cinefex and listed the entire staff on particular shows (Harry Potter springs to mind).  </p>
<p>I also fully realise that I work for the facility and not entirely on one show &#8211; although where each of us engineers were positioned made it easier to provide support for the show that was currently located in the same area.  We also occasionally got to go to the studios themselves to set-up kit, set-up specific configurations for the show and provide specific support for the show.  And all this juggling the other shows too.  In fact, it was mentioned on numerous occasions in meeting that each show would have one engineer assigned to it as a specific support point for artists, producers, etc.</p>
<p>The credits system, to me, appears to be inconsistent regardless of however an individual facility works.  The reason I gave up working for MPC was there was no career progression.  Those of us that wanted to go into the more creative side ended up doing the crap jobs and moving between departments was a painful experience.  I also lost confidence in senior staff after speaking to them in confidence only to discover they&#8217;ve talked to other people that I specifically asked them not to. </p>
<p>I was poised to move to Framestore at one point, but they clearly never bothered to listen to why I wanted to move away from MPC and what I wanted and as such the negotiations broke down (and my opinion of them rapidly dropped &#8211; they don&#8217;t care about people, it&#8217;s all about numbers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VFX and the Film Industry: Credit where benefit&#8217;s due &#8211; for artists &amp; engineers by Paddy Eason</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/02/10/vfx-and-the-film-industry-benefit-where-credits-due-for-artists-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Eason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=505#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, Martyn, and I agree with most of your points. But I think it should be pointed out that position in the end roller isn&#039;t necessarily a reflection of importance. There ate probably a lot of historic reasons for how they are ordered, but it seems to me that chiefly, vfx tend to come late because they are part of POST production. Like music, which also comes late. Secondly, and you know this, tech infrastructure people in facilities may not be considered part of the &#039;crew&#039; for a specific show, as their work load is spread across all the shows being done at that facility. In a sense they are working for the facility, not the show. Accounts people, or the HR department, or most of the managers at the facility probably don&#039;t get credits either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, Martyn, and I agree with most of your points. But I think it should be pointed out that position in the end roller isn&#8217;t necessarily a reflection of importance. There ate probably a lot of historic reasons for how they are ordered, but it seems to me that chiefly, vfx tend to come late because they are part of POST production. Like music, which also comes late. Secondly, and you know this, tech infrastructure people in facilities may not be considered part of the &#8216;crew&#8217; for a specific show, as their work load is spread across all the shows being done at that facility. In a sense they are working for the facility, not the show. Accounts people, or the HR department, or most of the managers at the facility probably don&#8217;t get credits either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The call of *COUGH* Hulu by Mo</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2010/02/10/the-call-of-hulu/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=500#comment-158</guid>
		<description>&quot;All I want is a open standard platform which I can watch what I want, when I want, and in a format of my choosing.  I don’t care how it’s done, I just want it to work without too many (if any) restrictions.&quot;

Bingo. Couldn&#039;t agree more. Canvas would find it difficult to be further removed from this ideal (under the misleading guise of being &quot;open&quot;). If you&#039;ve not read it already, you might find my response to the latest BBC Trust consultation on it of interest:

http://files.me.com/mo.mcroberts/suvob2

(PDF link).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All I want is a open standard platform which I can watch what I want, when I want, and in a format of my choosing.  I don’t care how it’s done, I just want it to work without too many (if any) restrictions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bingo. Couldn&#8217;t agree more. Canvas would find it difficult to be further removed from this ideal (under the misleading guise of being &#8220;open&#8221;). If you&#8217;ve not read it already, you might find my response to the latest BBC Trust consultation on it of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://files.me.com/mo.mcroberts/suvob2" rel="nofollow">http://files.me.com/mo.mcroberts/suvob2</a></p>
<p>(PDF link).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stargate Universe: It&#8217;s very good, but take the camera folk off the caffeine! by will</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/10/19/stargate-universe-its-very-good-but-take-the-camera-folk-off-the-caffeine/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.drake.org.uk/?p=13#comment-155</guid>
		<description>LOL, get a grip you lot ive been a fan of stargate ever scince it came out but 10 serise and 3 films on SG1 and 5 serise of atlantas is more than enuff of the same where in so much trouble, but we will get through it untill we land ourselves into even more trouble next week story line. SGU is more bassed on the people than the ship or location i love it its just like Lost was in its first serise. the writers have gone for realisam (as far as a bunch of people in a ship across the universe can be :P) rather than just writing SG1 with a differnt cast its a breath of fresh air to stargate i carnt wait to see more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, get a grip you lot ive been a fan of stargate ever scince it came out but 10 serise and 3 films on SG1 and 5 serise of atlantas is more than enuff of the same where in so much trouble, but we will get through it untill we land ourselves into even more trouble next week story line. SGU is more bassed on the people than the ship or location i love it its just like Lost was in its first serise. the writers have gone for realisam (as far as a bunch of people in a ship across the universe can be <img src='http://www.drake.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ) rather than just writing SG1 with a differnt cast its a breath of fresh air to stargate i carnt wait to see more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Minding the Gapps.. by Martyn Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/28/minding-the-gapps/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=412#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Android works equally well with any standard POP3 or IMAP server for email.  I&#039;m sure alternatively calendaring products could be used as well.  Blog remaining firmly with WordPress and Memset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android works equally well with any standard POP3 or IMAP server for email.  I&#8217;m sure alternatively calendaring products could be used as well.  Blog remaining firmly with WordPress and Memset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Minding the Gapps.. by MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/28/minding-the-gapps/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=412#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Sorry to see that Android discourages use of competing products.

Does this mean your blog is going to be moving or unreadable again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to see that Android discourages use of competing products.</p>
<p>Does this mean your blog is going to be moving or unreadable again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop the X-Factor from killing our music industry! by Jaysen</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/06/stop-the-x-factor-from-killing-our-music-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaysen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=249#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Shame most of the public have an inability to wake up and see the truth for themselves. We at TheMusicVoid think so. But it&#039;s not just the X-Factor that is killing music. The rot is happening from within via greedy executives - http://bit.ly/6T0dAa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Shame most of the public have an inability to wake up and see the truth for themselves. We at TheMusicVoid think so. But it&#8217;s not just the X-Factor that is killing music. The rot is happening from within via greedy executives &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/6T0dAa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6T0dAa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas without a TV is brilliant! by Richy C.</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/26/christmas-without-a-tv-is-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=408#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Out of interest Martyn, if the BBC were to add authentication to the iPlayer (&quot;Please enter your TV licence number here for validation or please pay for access&quot;), would you then be inclined to buy a licence or pay for access? If so, how much?

What&#039;s my interest? Well, I do love the BBC (especially BBC News website) and feel that it should be supported and kept independent and ad-free (and that ITV should not get any of the licence fee), but I&#039;m also very tempted to go &quot;TV-free&quot; like yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of interest Martyn, if the BBC were to add authentication to the iPlayer (&#8220;Please enter your TV licence number here for validation or please pay for access&#8221;), would you then be inclined to buy a licence or pay for access? If so, how much?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s my interest? Well, I do love the BBC (especially BBC News website) and feel that it should be supported and kept independent and ad-free (and that ITV should not get any of the licence fee), but I&#8217;m also very tempted to go &#8220;TV-free&#8221; like yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The HTC Hero/G2 Touch makes using a mobile phone fun again! by MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/21/the-htc-herog2-touch-makes-using-a-mobile-phone-fun-again/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=392#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I just spent a few minutes browsing that HTC Hero link. It&#039;s very light on details: what are the phone&#039;s features?  Does it do wifi?  VoIP?  J2ME?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent a few minutes browsing that HTC Hero link. It&#8217;s very light on details: what are the phone&#8217;s features?  Does it do wifi?  VoIP?  J2ME?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ice Ice Crashy by MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/17/ice-ice-crashy/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=377#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Sorry to read that.  Ice-biking is a very difficult task.  One tip is to run your tyres a bit softer than usual, but that does put you more at risk of punctures and nothing will help if you hit a large patch of shiny stuff.

I fell on ice today when walking, even though I was being fairly careful. I&#039;ve been out with the grit now and dealt with that spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to read that.  Ice-biking is a very difficult task.  One tip is to run your tyres a bit softer than usual, but that does put you more at risk of punctures and nothing will help if you hit a large patch of shiny stuff.</p>
<p>I fell on ice today when walking, even though I was being fairly careful. I&#8217;ve been out with the grit now and dealt with that spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technology/Post-Production company Thomson files for bankruptcy protection! by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/17/technologypost-production-company-thomson-files-for-bankruptcy-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=383#comment-99</guid>
		<description>As a MPC employee, I can safely say this has no impact whatsoever on any of MPC&#039;s staff or our clients. The Thomson filing in the US is merely a companion to the &#039;sauvegarde&#039; filing in France from a week or two ago which is part of a long, complex financial process to restructure the company&#039;s debts as it continues the transition away from consumer electronics to media services. That news article looks more alarming than it is. Business as usual at MPC, some particularly cool projects in the works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a MPC employee, I can safely say this has no impact whatsoever on any of MPC&#8217;s staff or our clients. The Thomson filing in the US is merely a companion to the &#8217;sauvegarde&#8217; filing in France from a week or two ago which is part of a long, complex financial process to restructure the company&#8217;s debts as it continues the transition away from consumer electronics to media services. That news article looks more alarming than it is. Business as usual at MPC, some particularly cool projects in the works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stargate Universe: It&#8217;s very good, but take the camera folk off the caffeine! by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/10/19/stargate-universe-its-very-good-but-take-the-camera-folk-off-the-caffeine/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.drake.org.uk/?p=13#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I can wrap up what happened in every episode of season one of Stargate Universe.

Walk around a lot, bitch, moan, slap some one cry about it, slap someone again, moan a little more, bore the crap out of the viewers,walk around a bit more.

&quot;That&#039;s It&quot; That&#039;s every episode in a nut shell, No more no less, no Aliens, no explosions, no humour, no team work, no entertainment whatsoever.

They must have a rich backer or something with all the adverts saying it great and fantastic and blah blah blah.


SORRY IT IS ABSOLUTE BORING CRAP !!!!!!!!

Sci fi NO

Drama NO

Entertaining NO

Good acting NO

Good Characters NO

Boring Shite HELL YES!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can wrap up what happened in every episode of season one of Stargate Universe.</p>
<p>Walk around a lot, bitch, moan, slap some one cry about it, slap someone again, moan a little more, bore the crap out of the viewers,walk around a bit more.</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s It&#8221; That&#8217;s every episode in a nut shell, No more no less, no Aliens, no explosions, no humour, no team work, no entertainment whatsoever.</p>
<p>They must have a rich backer or something with all the adverts saying it great and fantastic and blah blah blah.</p>
<p>SORRY IT IS ABSOLUTE BORING CRAP !!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Sci fi NO</p>
<p>Drama NO</p>
<p>Entertaining NO</p>
<p>Good acting NO</p>
<p>Good Characters NO</p>
<p>Boring Shite HELL YES!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloudy with a chance of falling files.. by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/16/cloudy-with-a-chance-of-falling-files/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=365#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Hey Martin,

Thanks so much for mentioning CloudBerry Lab products in your blog and pointing out their flaws. We will be working on them

Thanks
Andy
CloudBerry lab team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Martin,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for mentioning CloudBerry Lab products in your blog and pointing out their flaws. We will be working on them</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Andy<br />
CloudBerry lab team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BAF-TA-RA by Martyn Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/14/bafta-ra/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=356#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I got that impression, but it was difficult separating the BAFTA members with the rest of those going to see the show (and those BAFTA members going to see the show, if you see what I mean).  

By way of an apology, I&#039;m going to make a small donation to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund.  And a charity of Hilary&#039;s choice too.  It is the very least I can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got that impression, but it was difficult separating the BAFTA members with the rest of those going to see the show (and those BAFTA members going to see the show, if you see what I mean).  </p>
<p>By way of an apology, I&#8217;m going to make a small donation to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund.  And a charity of Hilary&#8217;s choice too.  It is the very least I can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BAF-TA-RA by Neil Gaiman</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/14/bafta-ra/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Gaiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=356#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Worth bearing in mind that it wasn&#039;t a BAFTA screening, but a Cast &amp; Crew screening -- so everyone sort of did know everyone -- they&#039;d all made the films you were going to see. Really sorry you couldn&#039;t stay, Martyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth bearing in mind that it wasn&#8217;t a BAFTA screening, but a Cast &amp; Crew screening &#8212; so everyone sort of did know everyone &#8212; they&#8217;d all made the films you were going to see. Really sorry you couldn&#8217;t stay, Martyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on T-Mobile UK forums: eye test/CAPTCHA is official PIA by Richy C.</title>
		<link>http://www.drake.org.uk/2009/12/13/t-mobile-uk-forums-eye-testcaptcha-is-official-pia/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drake.org.uk/?p=351#comment-89</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good example why you should drop vowels (a,e,i,o,u and y) from captchas - it could generate a word much worse than that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good example why you should drop vowels (a,e,i,o,u and y) from captchas &#8211; it could generate a word much worse than that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
