I love Better Call Saul. Great show. But if there is one thing that infuriates me about AMC TV’s strategy is the complete disregard for international viewers on social media and on the web. They will regularly advertise things like this on their official Better Call Saul Twitter:
You visit the AMC TV web site. You click on Watch Video. “Sorry, this video is not available in your location” (or some similar wording).
Let’s make something clear: the internet was designed to be an open platform. Yet old media deems that it can enforce regionalisation. I have heard all the excuses: licensing, marketing, rights, whatever. But as a viewer ( Better Call Saul is available in the UK via Netflix), I find it frustrating that the show’s owner (AMC TV) is not able to make available this content outside the US. There’s only one Better Call Saul Twitter account. It has an international following. There are, to my knowledge, no local/regional Twitter accounts relating to Better Call Saul. So you can’t tell me to simply follow the UK Better Call Saul Twitter feed – because there is no official UK Better Call Saul Twitter feed.
Another AMC TV show, The Walking Dead, *does* have local/regional Twitter feeds. But the UK one hasn’t been verified. D’OH! This makes is difficult to ascertain whether information coming from it is official or not.
I’m sick and tired of geoblocking promotional stuff for TV shows that we can get over here in the UK. And I’m stuck and tired of the excuses.
(On a separate note: having bought the first two seasons of HBO’s Silicon Valley on Blu-Ray, HBO appear to have chosen not to release the third season on the same format – only DVD. I have no idea what that’s about, but if HBO doesn’t pull its finger out in being consistent with it releases, I won’t be buying anything of their stuff again)
My biggest fear with buying digital only copies of films and television shows is if the provider goes away – whether it’s due to bankruptcy, change of direction – whatever. As I’ve been sticking with the iTunes ecosystem for the majority of the time, I trust Apple to do the right thing and ensure I am able to download and watch my movies regardless of whatever happens to the movie or TV studio that supplied them with the content. So far so good.
But, alas, the poor old BBC has announced that it’ll be shutting down its all digital BBC Store from 1st November 2017. I’ve used BBC Store a number of times over the past 18 months, amassing a few titles here and there. It was relatively cheap, and they often had many titles on sale. My biggest complaint with the BBC Store, however, is actually watching the titles on my TV. What a pain in the arse that was. The BBC iPlayer baked into my LG TV, Apple TV, plus the games consoles I used to have, never supported BBC Store titles. And there was no native BBC Store app for them either. Thus I had to buy a Google Chromecast to be able to cast the content from my mobile phone to it. No problem watching the content on my phone or tablet, but it’s not ideal – and this is why I think the BBC has failed – it felt as if it didn’t put enough resources into developing the BBC iPlayer integration or BBC Store apps across multiple platforms.
(Ironically, as the mega corporate AT&T is set to buy Time Warner, Inc. and take over HBO – AT&T’s boss has been semi-joking that he wants to provide 20 minute mobile friendly episodes of Game of Thrones – this sort of thing horrifies me – I’m all about choice, but the important thing is that television is television and should be viewed as (and on) such)
Another problem with BBC Store is that many of BBC’s titles are available on the likes of Netflix and Amazon Prime. The BBC has said that it wasn’t able to compete with these services, but I still say they just did not put enough effort or resources into making the content available across platforms as easily as Netflix or Amazon Prime (which, BTW, should be coming to Apple TV next month if rumours are true).
Ultimately it’s a slap in the face for digital TV and movie consumption. But I also ask: is TV and film going the same way as music? Do people actually prefer to pay a monthly subscription fee to consume as much content as possible, rather than simply buy a title outright? While the BBC is refunding those of us for the content we’ve paid for (plus, very ironically, a £20 Amazon voucher for similar digital content), it doesn’t make it easy for us to be able to repurchase the content elsewhere. With content providers bemoaning that piracy is ruining the entertainment industry – it forgets very easily that if more effort was made to make the content available quickly and cheaply, and across as many platforms as possible, their rhetoric might be a bit more believable!
Windows Servers. What a load of old tosh. The past three weeks or so have seen me tinkering unnecessarily with the blasted things because of Microsoft’s inability to write an operating system which is so super sensitive to hardware changes – principally because of licensing – that just by upgrading underlying virtualisation software triggers the operating system to think it has a new network card. You can imagine the chaos something like that can cause!
It’s not just that which makes me despise Windows Server. For similar reasons, if a dedicated server chassis dies and needs to be swapped out – you’d better have a spare because any hardware changes will cause Windows to freak out. Linux has no problem with such things providing you’re using a modern distribution and reasonably up to date hardware. Generally speaking, with maybe a very few exceptions, Linux Just Works(tm).
Don’t get me started on those people that are still running the now 15 year old Windows 2003.. (though this article about Fasthosts running Windows 2003 for their backup platform made me laugh a lot more than it should – and bury my hands in my face for leaving an obsolete OS in charge of managing critical customer backups).
The whole WCry situation around these parts has been, strangely, pretty good – indeed, a lot more people have taken an interest in their backups and patching their systems and this is only to be commended. A good old major outbreak tends to kick people in the teeth and get them thinking about disaster recovery.
Just because I use MacOS and Linux isn’t making me complacent – oh no. Very recently Apple just released updates to iOS, MacOS and WatchOS to fix a rather nasty exploit, as well as general performance updates. It’s one of the reasons I went back to iOS – Apple has become very good at rolling out updates much faster and on schedule than the likes of Samsung.
The server on which this blog runs on utilises something called KernelCare which patches the kernel in real time for newly discovered exploits. This has the advantage of:
- Not having to wait for the OS vendor to release a patch.
- You don’t have to reboot the machine.
In my testing of KernelCare, it has worked very well. If you’re using it in a VPS, it must support full virtualisation – paravirtualisation won’t cut it.
Meanwhile, Microsoft should stick to producing office productivity software and gaming (Xbox One) – it’s what they’re good at. I’ve completely lost faith in their desktop and server operating system divisions.
The ISP industry doesn’t tell the music or film/TV industries how to make music or film/TV programmes (unless you’re an ISP owned by a film & TV company – but that’s a whole different story), so don’t tell those in the ISP industry how to police content. Putting aside the technological issue for the moment, it is the same as asking the Post Office to open every single letter to check the content’s legality. And there is the whole thing about trying to understand and control another industry – you just can’t do that. Especially if you have no experience of running a telecommunications company.
And then there are the takedown reports. Just how accurate are they? I read many reports that automated takedowns are becoming more and more erroneous – asking companies such as Facebook or Google to take down their own home pages. Even film studios themselves have been asked to take down their own home pages – by themselves!
We have the justice system for a reason – to determine whether something is right or wrong, and to act upon it. This is why I strongly advocate the use of court orders against ISPs when there is reasonable evidence to suspect something is wrong. That it must be the copyright owner’s responsibility to flag up potential issues, get a court order, then get the ISP to take down and provide the court with the potential offender’s details. ISPs are not the police, the courts or anything else. They provide a communications service. It must remain as such. If the media think otherwise, they are greatly mistaken.
Unfortunately, while I have genuinely liked the Galaxy S8+, I’m swapping it back for the iPhone 7 Plus. The biggest issue I’ve found with the S8+ was the lack of Android Pay support in some apps which somehow worked with the OnePlus 3T (Starbucks, IIRC) and the Arriva Bus Ticket app keeps crashing with alarming regularity – and at the most inconvenient times. Never happened with the OnePlus 3T. Plus the size of the phone means that many apps can’t take full advantage of the screen size. Yes, in time, this will change – especially as the LG 6 shares the same aspect ratio. We’re going to see a lot more phones adapt this kind of size/ratio in the future.
So why not just stick with the OnePlus 3T? Well, I think it’s a very fine phone, but the battery life just isn’t great. It ran out of juice on one of my trips out of Edinburgh and I rely fairly heavily on the likes of Google Maps to get me around. It’s good enough for a backup phone, but I can’t say it’d be very good for a daily driver. Especially if one is doing on-call. And that reminds me – the Galaxy S8+ speaker isn’t that great – and I found myself missing on-call alerts.
So Apple it is. I can’t say I shall be trying this again – two years in a trot with Android and Every. Single. Time. I come back to IOS. That either says something about the strength Apple’s ecosystem, or how well iOS has been designed. I don’t know. Much of it is down to marketing, and to be fair to Samsung, they pulled off a very good campaign. But has not been helped by the lack of the Gear 360 or the VR headset at the time of the S8’s launch either.
By heading back to iOS, I regain the ability to use iMessage again. Many friends and family have this – and it’s particularly useful for those abroad. Getting everybody on WhatsApp has been difficult. I have other contacts on Skype. So it’s all a bit fragmented. Also Wi-Fi Calling. The S8+ is not compatible with Three’s Wi-Fi Calling service at this time, so there’s that too.
There is a part of me that desperately wants to love and use Android full time, but there are too many inconsistencies. Both in rolling out security updates (the Galaxy S8+ is still on April security updates), features (S8+ on version 7, the OnePlus 3T is on 7.1.1), and app performance. iOS fixes many of these issues, and thus after the great swaparoos of 2016 and 2017, I declare iOS as the recommended mobile platform.
Now, I had a bet with somebody about all this, and I owe them a crate of Budweiser beer…